Rituximab maintenance versus retreatment in follicular lymphoma. Hematol Oncol 2013 Dec;31(4):171-8
Date
10/10/2012Pubmed ID
23044794DOI
10.1002/hon.2033Scopus ID
2-s2.0-84889100671 (requires institutional sign-in at Scopus site) 5 CitationsAbstract
Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common type of indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Although the introduction of the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab has represented a major breakthrough, FL remains incurable with standard chemoimmunotherapies. The goals of therapy in symptomatic FL patients include the following: obtaining high response rates, extending the duration of remission, prolongation of survival and improving quality of life, while minimizing adverse events. To extend remission duration and possibly survival outcomes, maintenance therapy with rituximab has been shown to be effective in both frontline and relapsed/refractory settings. However, the optimal timing, schedule and length of maintenance therapy are controversial. Herein, we review the current data for maintenance rituximab in FL, discuss the current controversies for this modality, attempt to define its role relative to the more conservative retreatment approach and provide practical recommendations for its clinical use.
Author List
Palla AR, Hamadani MAuthor
Mehdi H. Hamadani MD Professor in the Medicine department at Medical College of WisconsinMESH terms used to index this publication - Major topics in bold
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
Combined Modality Therapy
Drug Administration Schedule
Forecasting
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Humans
Immunotherapy
Lymphoma, Follicular
Maintenance Chemotherapy
Multicenter Studies as Topic
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Recurrence
Remission Induction
Rituximab
Salvage Therapy
Transplantation, Autologous