Why are peer review outcomes less favorable for clinical science than for basic science grant applications? Am J Med 2008 Jul;121(7):637-41
Date
07/01/2008Pubmed ID
18589061Pubmed Central ID
PMC2517849DOI
10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.03.031Scopus ID
2-s2.0-45749151413 (requires institutional sign-in at Scopus site) 5 CitationsAuthor List
Martin MR, Lindquist T, Kotchen TAMESH terms used to index this publication - Major topics in bold
Biomedical ResearchHumans
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Peer Review, Research
Research Support as Topic
United States