Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in adults and children: effects of lateral to medial placement of the nucleus 24 contour electrode array. Otol Neurotol 2009 Jun;30(4):464-70
Date
03/21/2009Pubmed ID
19300297DOI
10.1097/MAO.0b013e31819fe7eaScopus ID
2-s2.0-68249132073 (requires institutional sign-in at Scopus site) 11 CitationsAbstract
OBJECTIVE: Previous electrophysiologic studies of electrode placement within the scala tympani in both animals and humans have shown effects on neural responses to electrical stimulation. The specific effects, however, may be dependent on electrode design, the location of an electrode along the array, and the method of perimodiolar positioning. The present study compares the effects of lateral and medial positioning of the Nucleus Contour electrode array on electrophysiologic responses in adult and pediatric subjects.
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical study.
SETTING: Comprehensive Cochlear Implant Program/Tertiary Referral Center.
PATIENTS: Subjects were adults (n = 15) and children (n = 20) who were consecutively implanted at our center with the Nucleus 24 Contour device.
INTERVENTION: Rehabilitative.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intraoperative electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABRs) were recorded within subjects for lateral and medial placement of the electrode array. Effects of electrode placement on EABR Wave V threshold and suprathreshold amplitude were measured.
RESULTS: Group analyses showed significant decreases in EABR threshold and significant increases in EABR amplitude across all electrodes with medial electrode placement. The effects differed across electrode locations for the adult and pediatric subjects. No significant changes in Wave V input/output function slope were found.
CONCLUSION: Medial electrode placement from stylet removal with the Nucleus 24 Contour array results in an increased neural response compared with the lateral condition as demonstrated by lower threshold and larger suprathreshold amplitude of the EABR. Possible clinical implications of these findings are lower psychophysical threshold and comfortable levels with medial cochlear electrode position.
Author List
Runge-Samuelson C, Firszt JB, Gaggl W, Wackym PAAuthor
Christina Runge PhD Associate Provost, Chief, Professor in the Otolaryngology department at Medical College of WisconsinMESH terms used to index this publication - Major topics in bold
AdolescentAdult
Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Auditory Threshold
Child
Child, Preschool
Cochlear Implantation
Cochlear Implants
Electrodes
Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem
Hearing Loss
Humans
Infant
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Scala Tympani