Medical College of Wisconsin
CTSICores SearchResearch InformaticsREDCap

Analysis of Drug Development Paradigms for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res 2018 Apr 15;24(8):1785-1794

Date

12/08/2017

Pubmed ID

29212781

Pubmed Central ID

PMC5899646

DOI

10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1970

Scopus ID

2-s2.0-85047857372 (requires institutional sign-in at Scopus site)   41 Citations

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have unique toxicities and response kinetics compared with cytotoxic and gene-targeted anticancer agents. We investigated the impact of innovative/accelerated immunotherapy drug development/approval models on the accuracy of safety and efficacy assessments by searching the FDA website. Initial phase I trials for each agent were reviewed and safety and efficacy data compared with that found in later trials leading to regulatory approvals of the same agents. As of June 2017, the FDA approved six checkpoint inhibitors for a variety of cancer types. All checkpoint inhibitors received a priority review status and access to at least two additional FDA special access programs, more often breakthrough therapy designation and accelerated approval. Median clinical development time (investigational new drug application to approval) was 60.77 months [avelumab had the shortest timeline (52.33 months)]. Response rates during early phase I trials (median = 16%) are higher than for phase I trials of other agents (with the exception of gene-targeted agents tested with a biomarker). Doses approved were usually not identical to doses recommended on phase I trials. Approximately 50% of types of immune-related and 43% of types of clinically relevant toxicities from later trials were identified in early-phase trials. Even so, treatment-related mortality remains exceedingly low in later studies (0.33% of patients). In conclusion, efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors appear to be reasonably predicted from the dose-finding portion of phase I trials, indicating that the fast-track development of these agents is safe and justified. Clin Cancer Res; 24(8); 1785-94. ©2017 AACR.

Author List

Jardim DL, de Melo Gagliato D, Giles FJ, Kurzrock R

Author

Razelle Kurzrock MD Center Associate Director, Professor in the Medicine department at Medical College of Wisconsin




MESH terms used to index this publication - Major topics in bold

Animals
Antineoplastic Agents
Biomarkers, Tumor
Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic
Humans
Immunomodulation
Neoplasms
Treatment Outcome