A tale of two cities: Policing and firearm homicides in Boston and Philadelphia. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2023 Nov 01;95(5):713-718
Date
07/07/2023Pubmed ID
37418695DOI
10.1097/TA.0000000000004008Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85175270988 (requires institutional sign-in at Scopus site) 2 CitationsAbstract
BACKGROUND: Recent political movements have raised questions about the effectiveness of police funding, but the impact of law enforcement budgets on firearm violence is unknown. We hypothesized that department funding and measures of police activity would be associated with decreased shootings and firearm homicides (FHs) in two major cities with different police funding patterns.
METHODS: We collected data from the following sources: district attorney's offices, police departments, Federal Bureau of Investigation Uniform Crime Reporting program, the Centers for Disease Control, the Annual Survey of Public Employment and Payroll, and the American Community Survey. Data included demographics, police department budgets, number of officers, homicide clearance rates, firearms recovered, shootings, and FHs, 2015 to 2020. Totals were normalized to population and number of shootings. We used panel linear regression to measure associations between policing variables, shootings, and FHs while adjusting for covariates.
RESULTS: Firearm homicides significantly increased in Philadelphia. In Boston, the trend was less clear, although there was an increase in 2020. Police budget normalized to shootings trended toward a decrease in Philadelphia and an increase in Boston. The number of firearms recovered annually appeared to increase in Boston but peaked midstudy in Philadelphia. In multivariable analyses, police budget was associated with neither shootings nor FHs. However, increased firearm recovery was associated with lower shooting ( β = -0.0004, p = 0.022) and FH ( β = -0.00005, p = 0.004) rates.
CONCLUSION: Philadelphia and Boston demonstrated differences in police funding, 2015 to 2020. While budget is not associated with shootings or FHs, firearm recovery is suggesting that removal of firearms from circulation remains key. The impact this has on vulnerable populations requires further investigation.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.
Author List
Hatchimonji JS, Bakillah E, Hynes AM, Torres CM, Sanchez SE, Seamon MJ, Scantling DRAuthor
Allyson M. Hynes MD Assistant Professor in the Surgery department at Medical College of WisconsinMESH terms used to index this publication - Major topics in bold
BostonCities
Firearms
Homicide
Humans
Philadelphia
Police
United States
Wounds, Gunshot









