Improving Patient Understanding of Emergency Department Discharge Instructions. West J Emerg Med 2024 Nov;25(6):917-920
Date
12/03/2024Pubmed ID
39625764Pubmed Central ID
PMC11610731DOI
10.5811/westjem.18579Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85211400230 (requires institutional sign-in at Scopus site) 3 CitationsAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have shown that patients in the emergency department (ED) are frequently given incomplete discharge instructions that are written at least four grade levels above the recommended sixth-grade reading level, leading to poor understanding. Our aims in this study were to implement standardized discharge instructions containing six key components written at a more appropriate reading level for common emergency department (ED) diagnoses to improve patient understanding.
METHODS: We conducted this study in a 20-bed ED at an urban Veteran's Administration hospital. Data was collected via in-person patient and clinician interviews. Patient interviews were conducted after patients received their discharge instructions. We compared patient responses to clinician responses and marked them as incorrect, partially correct, or correct with a score of 0, 0.5, or 1, respectively. The maximum possible score for each interview was six. Six key components of discharge instructions were asked about: diagnosis; new medications; at-home care; duration of illness; reasons to return; and follow-up. There were 25 patients in the pre-intervention group and 20 in the intervention group with the standardized set of instructions. We performed a Mann-Whitney U test on the total interview scores in the control and intervention groups and conducted a sub-analysis on the individual scores for each of the six key components.
RESULTS: The patients in the intervention demonstrated a statistically significant increase in patient-clinician correlation when compared to the patients in the pre-intervention group overall (P < 0.05), and two of the six key components of the discharge instructions individually showed statistically significant increase in patient-clinician correlation when standardized discharge instructions were used.
CONCLUSION: Patients who received the standardized discharge instructions had improved understanding of their discharge instructions. Future opportunities extending off this pilot study include expanding the number of diagnoses for which standardized instructions are used and investigating patient-centered outcomes related to these instructions.
Author List
Russell S, Jacobson N, Pavlic AAuthor
Nancy Jacobson MD Associate Professor in the Emergency Medicine department at Medical College of WisconsinMESH terms used to index this publication - Major topics in bold
AgedComprehension
Emergency Service, Hospital
Female
Health Literacy
Hospitals, Veterans
Humans
Interviews as Topic
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Discharge
Patient Education as Topic
