Minority Health Social Vulnerability and Its Association with Cancer Incidence: A Nationwide Ecological Investigation. Clin Med Res 2024 Dec;22(4):173-179
Date
02/25/2025Pubmed ID
39993826Pubmed Central ID
PMC11849966DOI
10.3121/cmr.2024.1856Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85219625404 (requires institutional sign-in at Scopus site)Abstract
Background: Cancer is a major public health concern in the United States, especially among minority populations. Area-level social determinants of health (SDOH) influence cancer outcomes, but the impact of the Minority Health Social Vulnerability Index (MHSVI) on cancer incidence at the county level is less understood.Methods: We analyzed ecological data from the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality for 3,232 counties in 2019. Exposures included MHSVI themes: socioeconomic, household composition, minority status/language, housing/transportation, healthcare infrastructure/access, and medical vulnerability (continuous). Overall MHSVI was categorized into low (.01/.25), moderate (.26/.74), and high (.75/1) percentiles. The outcome was the total number of cancer cases (continuous). Covariates included US regions and rural-urban regions. Unadjusted and adjusted negative binomial regressions with population weighting were performed using STATA/MPv.17; P values ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant.Results: A total of 3,232 counties were analyzed, with an average of 2,817.9 (SD:7,733.5) cancer cases, ranging from 16 to 201,547. All variables were significantly associated with cancer cases in unadjusted analyses. Adjusted analysis showed increased cancer incidence in moderate (IRR:0.94, 95%CI:0.92-0.96, P<0.001) and high (IRR:0.86, 95%CI:0.84-0.88, P<0.001) MHSVI areas compared to low MHSVI areas. Regional differences were observed, with increased cancer incidence in the Northeast (IRR:1.18, 95%CI:1.15-1.22, P<0.001), South (IRR:1.03, 95% CI:1.01-1.05, P<0.001), and West (IRR:0.92, 95%CI:0.90-0.94, P<0.001) compared to the Midwest. Rural areas had a slight increase in cancer incidence compared to urban areas (IRR:1.03, 95%CI:1.01-1.04, P<0.001).Conclusions: Our study highlights the significant association between MHSVI and cancer incidence at the county level. Regional and rural-urban differences were evident, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions addressing SDOH to reduce cancer disparities.
Author List
Shour AR, Jayarangaiah A, Anguzu R, Puthoff D, Onitilo AAuthor
Ronald Anguzu MD, PhD Assistant Professor in the Institute for Health and Humanity department at Medical College of WisconsinMESH terms used to index this publication - Major topics in bold
FemaleHumans
Incidence
Male
Middle Aged
Minority Groups
Minority Health
Neoplasms
Rural Population
Social Determinants of Health
Socioeconomic Factors
United States









