Faculty Collaboration Database

Adverse events of cold snare compared with hot snare and ablation endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal polyps. Endoscopy 2026 Feb;58(2):163-173

Date

07/28/2025

Pubmed ID

40719106

DOI

10.1055/a-2665-0521

Scopus ID

2-s2.0-105018592171 (requires institutional sign-in at Scopus site)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) techniques for large (≥20 mm) nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) have expanded with the introduction of ablation and cold EMR. This study assessed adverse events (AEs) for the newer EMR techniques, including cold EMR, compared with hot EMR.

METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of four prospective multicenter studies of consecutive patients with LNPCPs undergoing EMR from 2019 to 2024. The primary outcome was serious AEs (SAEs) with cold and hot EMR. Secondary outcomes included SAEs in the hot EMR subgroups (no ablation [hEMR], margin ablation [hEMR-m], margin and base ablation [hEMR-mb]).

RESULTS: 1762 patients (mean age 65.8; 1890 LNPCPs) were included: 522 cold and 1368 hot EMRs (368 hEMR, 770 hEMR-m, 230 hEMR-mb). SAEs were higher with hot EMR (4.7%, 95%CI 3.6%–5.9%) vs. cold EMR (1.9%, 95%CI 0.9%–3.5%), also for the subgroups of hEMR (6.0%, 95%CI 3.8%–8.9%), hEMR-m (3.9%, 95%CI 2.6%–5.5%), and hEMR-mb (5.2%, 95%CI 2.7%–8.9%). Serious postendoscopic bleeding (PEB) was numerically higher with hot EMR (2.3%, 95%CI 1.6%–3.3%) vs. cold EMR (1.3%, 95%CI 0.5%–2.7%), also for the subgroups of hEMR (3.0%, 95%CI 1.5%–5.3%), hEMR-m (1.9%, 95%CI 1.1%–3.2%), and hEMR-mb (2.6%, 95%CI 1.0%–5.6%). Perforation, intraprocedural and post-procedural, was numerically higher with hot EMR (1.2%, 95%CI 0.7%–2.0%) vs. cold EMR (0.2%, 95%CI 0.0%–1.1%). hEMR-m and hEMR-mb with clipping had lower rates of serious and overall PEB than no clipping.

CONCLUSIONS: Cold EMR demonstrated lower rates of SAEs, serious PEB, and perforation compared with hot EMR. Perforation and mortality occurred almost exclusively after hot EMR. Hot EMR with margin +/− base ablation did not increase SAEs compared with hot EMR without ablation.

Author List

Medawar E, Pohl H, Rex DK, Levenick JM, Pleskow DK, Khashab MA, Moyer M, Yang D, Melson J, Wallace MB, Mosko JD, Shahidi NC, Singh A, Gavric A, Djinbachian R, Gordon SR, Ngamruengphong S, Taunk P, Barber J, Piraka C, Elmunzer BJ, Aslanian HR, Elatrache M, Zolotarevsky E, Rastogi A, von Renteln D, Additional members of the Large Polyp Study Consortium

Author

Zachary Smith DO Associate Professor in the Medicine department at Medical College of Wisconsin

MESH terms used to index this publication - Major topics in bold

Aged
Colonic Polyps
Colonoscopy
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
Female
Humans
Male
Margins of Excision
Middle Aged
Multicenter Studies as Topic
Postoperative Complications
Prospective Studies