Evisceration and enucleation: a national survey of practice patterns in the United States. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2012;43(5):425-30
Date
09/18/2012Pubmed ID
22978523DOI
10.3928/15428877-20120725-01Scopus ID
2-s2.0-84866746707 (requires institutional sign-in at Scopus site) 33 CitationsAbstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The management of evisceration and enucleation has changed over time. The authors assessed the practice patterns regarding eye removal among oculoplastic surgeons.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Internet-based surveys were sent to American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons members regarding preferences in evisceration and/or enucleation, including indications, surgical techniques, preoperative evaluation modalities, implant types used, and postoperative complications experienced.
RESULTS: Surgeons who recently completed fellowship training are more likely to perform eviscerations than their senior counterparts. The variety of viable implant types and the use of enucleation or evisceration for certain indications were not always in concordance with historical guiding principles. However, changing trends are in line with the current literature.
CONCLUSION: Current practice patterns reflect recent literature and historical trends.
Author List
Shah RD, Singa RM, Aakalu VK, Setabutr PAuthor
Vinay Kumar Aakalu MPH, MD Chair, Professor in the Ophthalmology department at Medical College of WisconsinMESH terms used to index this publication - Major topics in bold
Eye DiseasesEye Enucleation
Eye Evisceration
Health Care Surveys
Humans
Ophthalmology
Orbital Implants
Practice Patterns, Physicians'
Surveys and Questionnaires
United States
