HIV-AIDS patients' evaluation of health information on the internet: the digital divide and vulnerability to fraudulent claims. J Consult Clin Psychol 2004 Dec;72(6):1004-11
Date
12/23/2004Pubmed ID
15612847DOI
10.1037/0022-006X.72.6.1004Scopus ID
2-s2.0-10644243451 (requires institutional sign-in at Scopus site) 88 CitationsAbstract
Access to health information on the Internet has revolutionized how medical patients learn about their illnesses. Valuable information can be found online; however, many health Web sites contain inaccurate or misleading information. The authors surveyed 324 adults with HIV concerning their Internet use for obtaining health information. Health information found online was then rated for quality by participants and by medical professionals. Participants were less critical of health information found online than medical professionals and made smaller distinctions between high-quality and low-quality information. Assigning credibility to low-quality information was predicted by lower incomes and educational attainment, poorer reading comprehension, lower literacy levels, and irrational health beliefs. Results suggest that patients do not always evaluate online information critically and may be vulnerable to misinformation.
Author List
Benotsch EG, Kalichman S, Weinhardt LSAuthor
Lance S. Weinhardt MS,PhD Associate Dean for Research and Professor of Community and Behavioral Health Promotion in the Joseph. J. Zilber School of Public Health department at University of Wisconsin - MilwaukeeMESH terms used to index this publication - Major topics in bold
Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeAdult
Culture
Female
Fraud
HIV Seropositivity
Health Education
Humans
Information Dissemination
Internet
Male









