Medical College of Wisconsin
CTSICores SearchResearch InformaticsREDCap

Analysis of Neurologic Complications After Surgical Versus Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2019 Nov;33(11):3182-3195

Date

01/01/2019

Pubmed ID

30595485

DOI

10.1053/j.jvca.2018.11.011

Scopus ID

2-s2.0-85059086820   1 Citation

Abstract

Ove the last decade, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as the recommended approach over surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for many patients with aortic stenosis. While initial trials demonstrated a higher incidence of stroke with TAVR compared to SAVR, the incidence of stroke appears to have improved over time. With the increasing number of patients expected to undergo TAVR in the coming decades, it is important to review the incidence and etiology of stroke after SAVR and TAVR. Alterations in surgical technique for SAVR, and embolic protections devices for TAVR, have failed to demonstrate a clinically significant reduction in the incidence of post-procedural stroke. However, the definitions and assessment methods used for assessing stroke and neurological events varies among studies.

Author List

Krishnan S, Sharma A, Subramani S, Arora L, Mohananey D, Villablanca P, Ramakrishna H

Author

Divyanshu Mohananey MD Assistant Professor in the Medicine department at Medical College of Wisconsin




MESH terms used to index this publication - Major topics in bold

Aortic Valve
Aortic Valve Stenosis
Humans
Postoperative Complications
Severity of Illness Index
Stroke
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement