Medical College of Wisconsin
CTSIResearch InformaticsREDCap

Fitting parametric random effects models in very large data sets with application to VHA national data. BMC Med Res Methodol 2012 Oct 24;12:163

Date

10/26/2012

Pubmed ID

23095325

Pubmed Central ID

PMC3542162

DOI

10.1186/1471-2288-12-163

Scopus ID

2-s2.0-84867679582 (requires institutional sign-in at Scopus site)   14 Citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With the current focus on personalized medicine, patient/subject level inference is often of key interest in translational research. As a result, random effects models (REM) are becoming popular for patient level inference. However, for very large data sets that are characterized by large sample size, it can be difficult to fit REM using commonly available statistical software such as SAS since they require inordinate amounts of computer time and memory allocations beyond what are available preventing model convergence. For example, in a retrospective cohort study of over 800,000 Veterans with type 2 diabetes with longitudinal data over 5 years, fitting REM via generalized linear mixed modeling using currently available standard procedures in SAS (e.g. PROC GLIMMIX) was very difficult and same problems exist in Stata's gllamm or R's lme packages. Thus, this study proposes and assesses the performance of a meta regression approach and makes comparison with methods based on sampling of the full data.

DATA: We use both simulated and real data from a national cohort of Veterans with type 2 diabetes (n=890,394) which was created by linking multiple patient and administrative files resulting in a cohort with longitudinal data collected over 5 years.

METHODS AND RESULTS: The outcome of interest was mean annual HbA1c measured over a 5 years period. Using this outcome, we compared parameter estimates from the proposed random effects meta regression (REMR) with estimates based on simple random sampling and VISN (Veterans Integrated Service Networks) based stratified sampling of the full data. Our results indicate that REMR provides parameter estimates that are less likely to be biased with tighter confidence intervals when the VISN level estimates are homogenous.

CONCLUSION: When the interest is to fit REM in repeated measures data with very large sample size, REMR can be used as a good alternative. It leads to reasonable inference for both Gaussian and non-Gaussian responses if parameter estimates are homogeneous across VISNs.

Author List

Gebregziabher M, Egede L, Gilbert GE, Hunt K, Nietert PJ, Mauldin P



MESH terms used to index this publication - Major topics in bold

Biometry
Cohort Studies
Data Collection
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Humans
Models, Theoretical
Precision Medicine
Random Allocation
Retrospective Studies
Veterans