Medical College of Wisconsin
CTSICores SearchResearch InformaticsREDCap

Moving Toward a Consensus DSC-MRI Protocol: Validation of a Low-Flip Angle Single-Dose Option as a Reference Standard for Brain Tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019 04;40(4):626-633



Pubmed ID


Pubmed Central ID




Scopus ID

2-s2.0-85064588009   8 Citations


BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: DSC-MR imaging using preload, intermediate (60°) flip angle and postprocessing leakage correction has gained traction as a standard methodology. Simulations suggest that DSC-MR imaging with flip angle = 30° and no preload yields relative CBV practically equivalent to the reference standard. This study tested this hypothesis in vivo.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-four patients with brain lesions were enrolled in this 3-institution study. Forty-three patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. DSC-MR imaging (3T, single-dose gadobutrol, gradient recalled-echo-EPI, TE = 20-35 ms, TR = 1.2-1.63 seconds) was performed twice for each patient, with flip angle = 30°-35° and no preload (P-), which provided preload (P+) for the subsequent intermediate flip angle = 60°. Normalized relative CBV and standardized relative CBV maps were generated, including postprocessing with contrast agent leakage correction (C+) and without (C-) contrast agent leakage correction. Contrast-enhancing lesion volume, mean relative CBV, and contrast-to-noise ratio obtained with 30°/P-/C-, 30°/P-/C+, and 60°/P+/C- were compared with 60°/P+/C+ using the Lin concordance correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis. Equivalence between the 30°/P-/C+ and 60°/P+/C+ protocols and the temporal SNR for the 30°/P- and 60°/P+ DSC-MR imaging data was also determined.

RESULTS: Compared with 60°/P+/C+, 30°/P-/C+ had closest mean standardized relative CBV (P = .61), highest Lin concordance correlation coefficient (0.96), and lowest Bland-Altman bias (μ = 1.89), compared with 30°/P-/C- (P = .02, Lin concordance correlation coefficient = 0.59, μ = 14.6) and 60°/P+/C- (P = .03, Lin concordance correlation coefficient = 0.88, μ = -10.1) with no statistical difference in contrast-to-noise ratios across protocols. The normalized relative CBV and standardized relative CBV were statistically equivalent at the 10% level using either the 30°/P-/C+ or 60°/P+/C+ protocols. Temporal SNR was not significantly different for 30°/P- and 60°/P+ (P = .06).

CONCLUSIONS: Tumor relative CBV derived from low-flip angle, no-preload DSC-MR imaging with leakage correction is an attractive single-dose alternative to the higher dose reference standard.

Author List

Schmainda KM, Prah MA, Hu LS, Quarles CC, Semmineh N, Rand SD, Connelly JM, Anderies B, Zhou Y, Liu Y, Logan B, Stokes A, Baird G, Boxerman JL


Jennifer M. Connelly MD Associate Professor in the Neurology department at Medical College of Wisconsin
Brent R. Logan PhD Director, Professor in the Institute for Health and Equity department at Medical College of Wisconsin
Kathleen M. Schmainda PhD Professor in the Biophysics department at Medical College of Wisconsin

MESH terms used to index this publication - Major topics in bold

Brain Neoplasms
Contrast Media
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Organometallic Compounds
Reference Standards