Surgery for Graves' disease: a 25-year perspective. Am J Surg 2013 Nov;206(5):669-73
Date
09/10/2013Pubmed ID
24011567DOI
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.07.005Scopus ID
2-s2.0-84886649456 (requires institutional sign-in at Scopus site) 21 CitationsAbstract
BACKGROUND: Optimal treatment of Graves' disease (GD) remains controversial. The authors retrospectively reviewed the surgical cases of GD at a single academic tertiary center.
METHODS: Demographic, clinical, and surgical data were analyzed for all patients with GD undergoing thyroidectomy over 25 years, in 3 periods: 1985 to 1993 (n = 32), 1994 to 2002 (n = 91), and 2003 to 2010 (n = 177).
RESULTS: There were 300 patients with GD (85.7% women; mean age, 39.3 years; median length of follow-up, 24.6 months). Overall, perioperative morbidity occurred in 36 patients (12.0%), and there was no mortality. Thyroidectomy-specific morbidity was very low, and the incidental malignancy rate was 10.3%.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment of GD has a very high safety profile, with low perioperative and thyroidectomy-specific morbidity, even in patients with overt hyperthyroidism. Incidental malignancy in patients with GD is not uncommon.
Author List
Phitayakorn R, Morales-Garcia D, Wanderer J, Lubitz CC, Gaz RD, Stephen AE, Ehrenfeld JM, Daniels GH, Hodin RA, Parangi SAuthor
Jesse Ehrenfeld MD, MPH Sr Associate Dean, Director, Professor in the Advancing a Healthier Wisconsin Endowment department at Medical College of WisconsinMESH terms used to index this publication - Major topics in bold
Ablation TechniquesAdult
Antithyroid Agents
Drainage
Female
Graves Disease
Humans
Incidental Findings
Iodine Radioisotopes
Length of Stay
Male
Massachusetts
Methimazole
Operative Time
Postoperative Complications
Preoperative Care
Propylthiouracil
Retrospective Studies
Thyroid Neoplasms
Thyroidectomy