Medical College of Wisconsin
CTSICores SearchResearch InformaticsREDCap

Utility of the surgical apgar score: validation in 4119 patients. Arch Surg 2009 Jan;144(1):30-6; discussion 37

Date

01/21/2009

Pubmed ID

19153322

DOI

10.1001/archsurg.2008.504

Scopus ID

2-s2.0-58749097614 (requires institutional sign-in at Scopus site)   119 Citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To confirm the utility of a 10-point Surgical Apgar Score to rate surgical outcomes in a large cohort of patients.

DESIGN: Using electronic intraoperative records, we calculated Surgical Apgar Scores during a period of 2 years (July 1, 2003, through June 30, 2005).

SETTING: Major academic medical center.

PATIENTS: Systematic sample of 4119 general and vascular surgery patients enrolled in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program surgical outcomes database at a major academic medical center.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of major postoperative complications and/or death within 30 days of surgery.

RESULTS: Of 1441 patients with scores of 9 to 10, 72 (5.0%) developed major complications within 30 days, including 2 deaths (0.1%). By comparison, among 128 patients with scores of 4 or less, 72 developed major complications (56.3%; relative risk, 11.3; 95% confidence interval, 8.6-14.8; P < .001), of whom 25 died (19.5%; relative risk, 140.7; 95% confidence interval, 33.7-587.4; P < .001). The 3-variable score achieves C statistics of 0.73 for major complications and 0.81 for deaths.

CONCLUSIONS: The Surgical Apgar Score provides a simple, immediate, objective means of measuring and communicating patient outcomes in surgery, using data routinely available in any setting. The score can be effective in identifying patients at higher- and lower-than-average likelihood of major complications and/or death after surgery and may be useful for evaluating interventions to prevent poor outcomes.

Author List

Regenbogen SE, Ehrenfeld JM, Lipsitz SR, Greenberg CC, Hutter MM, Gawande AA

Author

Jesse Ehrenfeld MD, MPH Sr Associate Dean, Director, Professor in the Advancing a Healthier Wisconsin Endowment department at Medical College of Wisconsin




MESH terms used to index this publication - Major topics in bold

Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications
Surgical Procedures, Operative