Faculty Collaboration Database

Impact of interhospital transfer on patient outcomes in emergency general surgery. Surgery 2021 Feb;169(2):455-459

Date

12/04/2020

Pubmed ID

33268072

DOI

10.1016/j.surg.2020.08.032

Scopus ID

2-s2.0-85093930199 (requires institutional sign-in at Scopus site)   15 Citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Emergency general surgery patients are at an increased risk for morbidity and mortality compared to their elective surgery counterparts. The complex nature of emergency general surgery conditions can challenge community hospitals, which may lack appropriate systems and personnel. Outcomes related to transfer have not been well-established. We aimed to compare postoperative outcomes of patients who were transferred from another hospital to a center with dedicated acute care surgery services with patients admitted directly to the acute care surgery centers.

METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of a national, multicenter review of emergency general surgery patients undergoing complex emergency general surgery at 5 centers across Canada. The primary outcome was the development of any complication. The adjusted odds of postoperative complication was assessed using logistic regression, controlling for age, comorbidities, duration of stay before transfer, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, and booking priority.

RESULTS: A total of 1,846 patients were included in the study, and 176 (9.5%) were transferred. Of these 21% (n = 37) underwent an operative procedure, and 15% (n = 27) underwent an operation at the transferring center. Transferred patients were more likely to have at least 1 comorbidity (68% vs 57%; P = .004), were classified as greater urgency on arrival (<2 hours booking priority, 43% vs 17%; P < .001), had a greater American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (American Society of Anesthesiologists ≥3 = 81% vs 65%; P < .001), a greater duration of operation (119 vs 110 minutes; P = .004), and were more likely to undergo a second operation (28% vs 14%; P < .001) compared to patients directly admitted to an acute care surgery center. On univariate analysis, transferred patients had greater rates of complications (48% vs 31%; P < .001), mortality (14% vs 7%; P = .005), and admission to the intensive care unit (22% vs 12%; P < .001). Transfer status remained an independent predictor of complication (odds ratio 1.9 [95% confidence interval 1.3-2.7]; P < .001) and intensive care unit admission (odds ratio 1.9 [95% confidence interval 1.2-3.0]; P = .007), but not mortality (odds ratio 1.1 [95% confidence interval 0.6-1.9]; P = .79) on regression analysis.

CONCLUSION: Complex emergency general surgery patients transferred to acute care surgery centers may have worse outcomes and greater use of resources compared to those admitted directly. This finding has clinically and financially important implications for the design and regionalization of acute care surgery services as well as resource allocation at acute care surgery centers.

Author List

Allen L, Vogt K, Joos E, van Heest R, Saleh F, Widder S, Hameed M, Parry NG, Minor S, Murphy P

Author

Patrick Murphy MD Assistant Professor in the Surgery department at Medical College of Wisconsin

MESH terms used to index this publication - Major topics in bold

Adult
Aged
Canada
Emergency Service, Hospital
Emergency Treatment
Female
Hospital Mortality
Humans
Length of Stay
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Transfer
Postoperative Complications
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Surgical Procedures, Operative
Tertiary Care Centers