Medical College of Wisconsin
CTSICores SearchResearch InformaticsREDCap

Multi-site clinical validation of Isothermal Amplification based SARS-COV-2 detection assays using different sampling strategies. medRxiv 2021 Jul 06

Date

07/17/2021

Pubmed ID

34268516

Pubmed Central ID

PMC8282105

DOI

10.1101/2021.07.01.21259879

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Isothermal amplification-based tests were developed as rapid, low-cost, and simple alternatives to real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests for SARS-COV-2 detection.

METHODS: Clinical performance of two isothermal amplification-based tests (Atila Biosystems iAMP COVID-19 detection test and OptiGene COVID-19 Direct Plus RT-LAMP test) was compared to clinical RT-PCR assays using different sampling strategies. A total of 1378 participants were tested across four study sites.

RESULTS: Compared to standard of care RT-PCR testing, the overall sensitivity and specificity of the Atila iAMP test for detection of SARS-CoV-2 were 76.2% and 94.9%, respectively, and increased to 88.8% and 89.5%, respectively, after exclusion of an outlier study site. Sensitivity varied based on the anatomic collected site. Sensitivity for nasopharyngeal was 65.4% (range across study sites:52.8%-79.8%), mid-turbinate 88.2%, saliva 55.1% (range across study sites:42.9%-77.8%) and anterior nares 66.7% (range across study sites:63.6%-76.5%). The specificity for these anatomic collection sites ranged from 96.7% to 100%. Sensitivity improved in symptomatic patients (overall 82.7%) and those with a higher viral load (overall 92.4% for ct≤25). Sensitivity and specificity of the OptiGene Direct Plus RT-LAMP test, conducted at a single study-site, were 25.5% and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: The Atila iAMP COVID test with mid-turbinate sampling is a rapid, low-cost assay for detecting SARS-COV-2, especially in symptomatic patients and those with a high viral load, and could be used to reduce the risk of SARS-COV-2 transmission in clinical settings. Variation of performance between study sites highlights the need for site-specific clinical validation of these assays before clinical adoption.

Author List

Desai KT, Alfaro K, Mendoza L, Faron M, Mesich B, Maza M, Dominguez R, Valenzuela A, Acosta CD, Martínez M, Felix JC, Masch R, Gabrilovich S, Plump M, Novetsky AP, Einstein MH, Douglas NC, Cremer M, Wentzensen N

Author

Juan Felix MD Vice Chair, Director, Professor in the Pathology department at Medical College of Wisconsin