Medical College of Wisconsin
CTSICores SearchResearch InformaticsREDCap

"What's the best way to document information concerning psychiatric patients? I just don't know"-A qualitative study about recording psychiatric patients notes in the era of electronic health records. PLoS One 2022;17(3):e0264255

Date

03/04/2022

Pubmed ID

35239698

Pubmed Central ID

PMC8893630

DOI

10.1371/journal.pone.0264255

Scopus ID

2-s2.0-85125690282 (requires institutional sign-in at Scopus site)   3 Citations

Abstract

This paper reports the results of a qualitative study regarding the main attitudes and concerns of Swiss psychiatrists related to the utility, usability and acceptability of EHR and how they address the pitfalls of sharing sensitive information with other parties. A total of 20 semi-structured interviews were carried out. Applied thematic analysis was used to identify themes with regard to participation. Three main themes were identified: 1) strengths of the use of EHR in the clinical context; 2) limitations of EHR; and 3) recommendations on preserving confidentiality in health records. The study shows variable practices of EHR use in psychiatric hospitals in Switzerland and a lack of standards on how to document sensitive information in EHR.

Author List

Chivilgina O, Elger BS, Benichou MM, Jotterand F

Author

Fabrice Jotterand PhD Professor in the Institute for Health and Equity department at Medical College of Wisconsin




MESH terms used to index this publication - Major topics in bold

Confidentiality
Electronic Health Records
Humans
Patients
Psychiatry
Qualitative Research