Medical College of Wisconsin
CTSICores SearchResearch InformaticsREDCap

Assessment of tumor treatment response using active contrast encoding (ACE)-MRI: Comparison with conventional DCE-MRI. PLoS One 2020;15(6):e0234520

Date

06/11/2020

Pubmed ID

32520950

Pubmed Central ID

PMC7286489

DOI

10.1371/journal.pone.0234520

Scopus ID

2-s2.0-85086356276 (requires institutional sign-in at Scopus site)   6 Citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the validity of contrast kinetic parameter estimates from Active Contrast Encoding (ACE)-MRI against those from conventional Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced (DCE)-MRI for evaluation of tumor treatment response in mouse tumor models.

METHODS: The ACE-MRI method that incorporates measurement of T1 and B1 into the enhancement curve washout region, was implemented on a 7T MRI scanner to measure tracer kinetic model parameters of 4T1 and GL261 tumors with treatment using bevacizumab and 5FU. A portion of the same ACE-MRI data was used for conventional DCE-MRI data analysis with a separately measured pre-contrast T1 map. Tracer kinetic model parameters, such as Ktrans (permeability area surface product) and ve (extracellular space volume fraction), estimated from ACE-MRI were compared with those from DCE-MRI, in terms of correlation and Bland-Altman analyses.

RESULTS: A three-fold increase of the median Ktrans by treatment was observed in the flank 4T1 tumors by both ACE-MRI and DCE-MRI. In contrast, the brain tumors did not show a significant change by the treatment in either ACE-MRI or DCE-MRI. Ktrans and ve values of the tumors from ACE-MRI were strongly correlated with those from DCE-MRI methods with correlation coefficients of 0.92 and 0.78, respectively, for the median values of 17 tumors. The Bland-Altman plot analysis showed a mean difference of -0.01 min-1 for Ktrans with the 95% limits of agreement of -0.12 min-1 to 0.09 min-1, and -0.05 with -0.37 to 0.26 for ve.

CONCLUSION: The tracer kinetic model parameters estimated from ACE-MRI and their changes by treatment closely matched those of DCE-MRI, which suggests that ACE-MRI can be used in place of conventional DCE-MRI for tumor progression monitoring and treatment response evaluation with a reduced scan time.

Author List

Zhang J, Winters K, Kiser K, Baboli M, Kim SG

Author

Mehran Baboli PhD Assistant Professor in the Radiology department at Medical College of Wisconsin




MESH terms used to index this publication - Major topics in bold

Animals
Antineoplastic Agents
Bevacizumab
Cell Line, Tumor
Contrast Media
Fluorouracil
Gadolinium DTPA
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Mice
Mice, Inbred BALB C
Mice, Inbred C57BL
Neoplasms, Experimental
Sensitivity and Specificity