Peak Cone Density Predicted from Outer Segment Length Measured on Optical Coherence Tomography. Curr Eye Res 2024 Mar;49(3):314-324
Date
12/26/2023Pubmed ID
38146597Pubmed Central ID
PMC10922793DOI
10.1080/02713683.2023.2289853Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85180900446 (requires institutional sign-in at Scopus site)Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare peak cone density predicted from outer segment length measured on optical coherence tomography with direct measures of peak cone density from adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopy.
METHODS: Data from 42 healthy participants with direct peak cone density measures and optical coherence tomography line scans available were used in this study. Longitudinal reflectivity profiles were analyzed using two methods of identifying the boundaries of the ellipsoid and interdigitation zones to estimate maximum outer segment length: peak-to-peak and the slope method. These maximum outer segment length values were then used to predict peak cone density using a previously described geometrical model. A comparison between predicted and direct peak cone density measures was then performed.
RESULTS: The mean bias between observers for estimating maximum outer segment length across methods was less than 2 µm. Cone density predicted from the peak-to-peak method against direct cone density measures showed a mean bias of 6,812 cones/mm2 with 50% of participants displaying a 10% difference or less between predicted and direct cone density values. Cone density derived from the slope method showed a mean bias of -17,929 cones/mm2 relative to direct cone density measures, with only 41% of participants demonstrating less than a 10% difference between direct and predicted cone density values.
CONCLUSION: Predicted foveal cone density derived from peak-to-peak outer segment length measurements using commercial optical coherence tomography show modest agreement with direct measures of peak cone density from adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopy. The methods used here are imperfect predictors of cone density, however, further exploration of this relationship could reveal a clinically relevant marker of cone structure.
Author List
Heitkotter H, Allphin MT, Untaroiu A, Min H, Warr E, Wynne N, Cooper RF, Carroll JAuthors
Joseph J. Carroll PhD Director, Professor in the Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences department at Medical College of WisconsinRobert F. Cooper Ph.D Assistant Professor in the Biomedical Engineering department at Marquette University
MESH terms used to index this publication - Major topics in bold
Fovea CentralisHumans
Ophthalmoscopy
Optics and Photonics
Retinal Cone Photoreceptor Cells
Tomography, Optical Coherence
