Practical guidance to identify and troubleshoot suboptimal DSC-MRI results. Front Radiol 2024;4:1307586
Date
03/06/2024Pubmed ID
38445104Pubmed Central ID
PMC10913595DOI
10.3389/fradi.2024.1307586Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85186888913 (requires institutional sign-in at Scopus site)Abstract
Relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) derived from dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) perfusion MR imaging (pMRI) has been shown to be a robust marker of neuroradiological tumor burden. Recent consensus recommendations in pMRI acquisition strategies have provided a pathway for pMRI inclusion in diverse patient care centers, regardless of size or experience. However, even with proper implementation and execution of the DSC-MRI protocol, issues will arise that many centers may not easily recognize or be aware of. Furthermore, missed pMRI issues are not always apparent in the resulting rCBV images, potentiating inaccurate or missed radiological diagnoses. Therefore, we gathered from our database of DSC-MRI datasets, true-to-life examples showcasing the breakdowns in acquisition, postprocessing, and interpretation, along with appropriate mitigation strategies when possible. The pMRI issues addressed include those related to image acquisition and postprocessing with a focus on contrast agent administration, timing, and rate, signal-to-noise quality, and susceptibility artifact. The goal of this work is to provide guidance to minimize and recognize pMRI issues to ensure that only quality data is interpreted.
