Impact of group size on the effectiveness of a resuscitation simulation curriculum for medical students. Teach Learn Med 2011 Jul-Sep;23(3):251-5
Date
07/13/2011Pubmed ID
21745060DOI
10.1080/10401334.2011.586920Scopus ID
2-s2.0-80054901440 10 CitationsAbstract
BACKGROUND: Simulation requires involvement from participants. However, it is unknown to what extent simulation effectiveness is a function of the number of participants.
PURPOSE: This study assessed the impact of varying group size on medical students' subjective experience of simulation and on postsimulation exam performance.
METHODS: Medical students were randomly assigned to groups of 2, 3, or 4. Retrospective assessment was done through a survey assessing confidence and knowledge as it relates to resuscitation and statements related to group size. Performance on a postsimulation exam was analyzed.
RESULTS: There were significant increases in students' confidence and knowledge following simulation. There were no significant differences in student perception of the effectiveness or realism of the simulation or in performance on the postsimulation exam as a function of group size.
CONCLUSIONS: Students feel that simulation is an effective way to learn medical knowledge. Varying group size had no effect on students' subjective experience or exam performance.
Author List
Rezmer J, Begaz T, Treat R, Tews MAuthor
Robert W. Treat PhD Associate Professor in the Academic Affairs department at Medical College of WisconsinMESH terms used to index this publication - Major topics in bold
CurriculumEducation, Medical, Undergraduate
Group Processes
Humans
Program Evaluation
Resuscitation
Retrospective Studies
Self Efficacy
Students, Medical
