Medical College of Wisconsin
CTSICores SearchResearch InformaticsREDCap

Limited utility of surveillance imaging for detecting disease relapse in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma in first complete remission. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 2014 Feb;14(1):50-5

Date

10/15/2013

Pubmed ID

24119465

DOI

10.1016/j.clml.2013.08.009

Scopus ID

2-s2.0-84892799685 (requires institutional sign-in at Scopus site)   25 Citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Surveillance imaging with computed tomography (CT) or positron emission tomography with CT (PET/CT) is commonly used in practice in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) who are in remission after front-line therapies. We aimed to determine the utility of routine imaging for detecting first relapse in patients with NHL in complete remission (CR) after first-line therapies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with NHL who achieved CR after first-line therapies and then subsequently had disease relapse. We evaluated whether the relapse was detected solely by surveillance CT or PET/CT or by patient-reported symptoms or physical examination findings, or both. Subgroup analysis was performed on baseline histologic type (indolent vs. aggressive NHL). Data were also collected to determine the cost of surveillance PET/CT and the number of additional diagnostic imaging procedures, invasive procedures, and iatrogenic complications directly resulting from an abnormality detected on a surveillance scan.

RESULTS: One hundred sixty-three patients with first relapse of NHL between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2010 were included. The majority of the relapses were detected by patient-reported symptoms or physical examination, or both, as opposed to surveillance imaging (77.9% [n = 127] vs. 22.1% [n = 36]; P < .0001). There was no overall survival difference between the 2 groups (P = .66). Patient-reported symptoms led to the detection of the majority of relapses in aggressive (85.7% [n = 72] vs. 14.3% [n = 12]; P < .0001) as well as indolent NHL (69.6% [n = 55] vs. 30.4% [n = 24]; P = .0007). Surveillance PET/CT contributed to more than 75% of follow-up health care costs in the first 2 years of monitoring for relapse. The surveillance imaging group had 1 reported case of iatrogenic pneumothorax.

CONCLUSION: Our retrospective analysis suggests that there is a limited role for surveillance imaging by CT or PET/CT in detecting first relapse in NHL. There was no difference in survival outcomes between the 2 groups in our study.

Author List

Truong Q, Shah N, Knestrick M, Curley B, Hu Y, Craig M, Hamadani M

Author

Mehdi H. Hamadani MD Professor in the Medicine department at Medical College of Wisconsin




MESH terms used to index this publication - Major topics in bold

Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Female
Humans
Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Positron-Emission Tomography
Retrospective Studies
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Young Adult