Medical College of Wisconsin
CTSICores SearchResearch InformaticsREDCap

Unrelated donor transplantation: peripheral blood or bone marrow--does it matter? Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2014;27(3-4):278-82

Date

12/03/2014

Pubmed ID

25455278

DOI

10.1016/j.beha.2014.10.010

Scopus ID

2-s2.0-84923858062 (requires institutional sign-in at Scopus site)   6 Citations

Abstract

Over the past decade, the use of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) has increased and now accounts for 70%-75% of grafts used for unrelated donor transplantation in adults with hematologic malignancy. It is important to recognize the shift in clinical practice from transplantation of bone marrow (BM) to PBPC occurred largely without adequate clinical data to support the change. It is presumed the change in clinical practice is attributed to results of randomized clinical trials in the setting of HLA-matched sibling transplantations. The results of these trials showed better engraftment but increased risk of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) with PBPC and possibly better survival for advanced leukemia. However, the results of HLA-matched sibling transplants may differ from that after unrelated donor transplants. There is greater genetic diversity between unrelated adult donors and their recipients and therefore greater risks of GVHD even if the donor and recipient are fully HLA-matched. This review explores the relative merits of transplantation of PBPC relative to BM for myeloablative and reduced-intensity conditioning unrelated donor transplantation for hematologic cancers in adults.

Author List

Eapen M

Author

Mary Eapen MBBS, DCh, MRCPI, MS Professor in the Medicine department at Medical College of Wisconsin




MESH terms used to index this publication - Major topics in bold

Acute Disease
Adult
Allografts
Bone Marrow Transplantation
Graft vs Host Disease
Hematologic Neoplasms
Histocompatibility Testing
Humans
Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Unrelated Donors