Hand appearance as a patient motivation for surgery and a determinant of satisfaction with metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis. J Hand Surg Am 2011 Jun;36(6):1007-1014.e1-4
Date
05/03/2011Pubmed ID
21530103DOI
10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.02.002Scopus ID
2-s2.0-79958061541 (requires institutional sign-in at Scopus site) 33 CitationsAbstract
PURPOSE: To determine patient motivations for surgery and satisfaction with outcomes for metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint arthroplasty in 3 domains (appearance, function, and pain) and whether patient-reported satisfaction correlates with standard outcome measures.
METHODS: In a randomized controlled trial of MCP joint implants, 33 patients with rheumatoid arthritis had primary MCP joint arthroplasty: 15 hands received Swanson implants, and 18 received NeuFlex implants. Range of motion, ulnar drift, grip strength, Sollerman hand function test, and the Michigan Hand Questionnaire were collected before surgery and 1 year after surgery. Preoperative patient motivations for and expectations of MCP joint arthroplasty were assessed for function, pain, and appearance. Patient-perceived improvement and satisfaction within the 3 domains and global satisfaction were assessed after surgery.
RESULTS: Function was rated the most important motivator for surgery by 31 patients, pain by 22, and appearance by 15. Twenty-six patients rated 2 or more motivators equally high. Michigan Hand Questionnaire subscores were moderately correlated or weakly correlated with patient-reported satisfaction. The Sollerman score was weakly correlated with patient-reported satisfaction. Range of motion, ulnar drift, and grip strength were not correlated with patient-reported satisfaction. More patients stated that a much better improvement was obtained for appearance than for function or pain relief.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient expectations of MCP joint arthroplasty were uniformly high. The greatest motivation for surgery was functional improvement. Pain was highly ranked, and 25 patients rated hand appearance as the first or second motivator. Patient satisfaction correlated poorly with traditional outcome measures and moderately with patient-reported outcomes. We conclude that appearance should be considered an important motivator for surgery and determinant of satisfaction.
TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic I.
Author List
Bogoch ER, Escott BG, Ronald KAuthor
Benjamin G. Escott MBBS Associate Professor in the Orthopaedic Surgery department at Medical College of WisconsinMESH terms used to index this publication - Major topics in bold
AgedArthritis, Rheumatoid
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Finger
Esthetics
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Hand Strength
Humans
Joint Prosthesis
Male
Metacarpophalangeal Joint
Middle Aged
Motivation
Pain Measurement
Patient Satisfaction
Prospective Studies
Prosthesis Design
Range of Motion, Articular
Silicones
Statistics as Topic