Medical College of Wisconsin
CTSICores SearchResearch InformaticsREDCap

Hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization with "just-in-time" plerixafor approach is a cost-effective alternative to routine plerixafor use. Cytotherapy 2015 Dec;17(12):1785-92

Date

10/18/2015

Pubmed ID

26475754

Pubmed Central ID

PMC4700501

DOI

10.1016/j.jcyt.2015.09.002

Scopus ID

2-s2.0-84947584460 (requires institutional sign-in at Scopus site)   28 Citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AIMS: Hematopoietic cell mobilization with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and plerixafor results in superior CD34+ cell yield compared with G-CSF alone in patients with myeloma and lymphoma. However, plerixafor-based approaches may be associated with high costs. Several institutions use a "just-in-time" plerixafor approach, in which plerixafor is only administered to patients likely to fail mobilization with G-CSF alone. Whether such an approach is cost-effective is unknown.

METHODS: We evaluated 136 patients with myeloma or lymphoma who underwent mobilization with 2 approaches of plerixafor utilization. Between January 2010 and October 2012, 76 patients uniformly received mobilization with G-CSF and plerixafor. Between November 2012 and June 2014, 60 patients were mobilized with plerixafor administered only to those patients likely to fail mobilization with G-CSF alone.

RESULTS: The routine plerixafor group had a higher median peak peripheral blood CD34+ cell count (62 versus 29 cells/μL, P < 0.001) and a higher median day 1 CD34+ yield (2.9 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg versus 2.1 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, P = 0.001). The median total CD34+ collection was higher with routine plerixafor use (5.8 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg versus 4.5 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, P = 0.007). In the "just-in-time" group, 40% (n = 24) completed adequate collection without plerixafor. There was no difference in mobilization failure rates. The mean plerixafor doses used was lower with "just-in-time" approach (1.3 versus 2.1, P = 0.0002). The mean estimated cost in the routine plerixafor group was higher (USD 27,513 versus USD 23,597, P = 0.01).

DISCUSSION: Our analysis demonstrates that mobilization with a just-in-time plerixafor approach is a safe, effective, and cost-efficient strategy for HPC collection.

Author List

Veltri L, Cumpston A, Shillingburg A, Wen S, Luo J, Leadmon S, Watkins K, Craig M, Hamadani M, Kanate AS

Author

Mehdi H. Hamadani MD Professor in the Medicine department at Medical College of Wisconsin




MESH terms used to index this publication - Major topics in bold

Adult
Aged
Antigens, CD34
Benzylamines
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Female
Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization
Hematopoietic Stem Cells
Heterocyclic Compounds
Humans
Lymphoma
Male
Middle Aged
Multiple Myeloma
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult