Faculty Collaboration Database

A prospective time-series quality improvement trial of a standardized analgesia protocol to reduce postoperative pain among neurosurgery patients. J Neurosurg 2016 Dec;125(6):1523-1532

Date

03/12/2016

Pubmed ID

26967774

DOI

10.3171/2015.10.JNS15698

Scopus ID

2-s2.0-85018514165 (requires institutional sign-in at Scopus site)   24 Citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The inclusion of the pain management domain in the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey now ties patients' perceptions of pain and analgesia to financial reimbursement for inpatient stays. Therefore, the authors wanted to determine if a quality improvement initiative centered on a standardized analgesia protocol could significantly reduce postoperative pain among neurosurgery patients. METHODS The authors implemented a 10-month, prospective, interrupted time-series trial of a quality improvement initiative. The intervention consisted of a multimodal, interdepartmental, standardized analgesia protocol with process improvements from preadmission to discharge. All neurosurgical-floor patients participated in the quality improvement intervention, with data collected on a systematically randomly sampled subset of 96 patients for detailed analysis. Patient-reported numeric rating scale pain on the first postoperative day (POD) served as the primary outcome. RESULTS Implementation of the analgesia protocol resulted in improved preoperative and postoperative documentation of pain (p < 0.001) and improved use of multimodal analgesia, including use of NSAIDs (p < 0.009) and gabapentin (p < 0.027). This intervention also correlated with a 32% reduction in reported pain on the 1st POD for all neurosurgical patients (mean pain scale scores 4.31 vs 2.94; p = 0.000) and a 43% reduction among spinal surgery patients (mean pain scale scores 5.45 vs 3.10; p = 0.036). After controlling for covariates, implementation of the protocol was a significant predictor of lowered postoperative pain (p = 0.05) on the 1st POD. This reduction in pain correlated with protocol compliance (p = 0.028), and a significant decrease in the monthly number of naloxone doses suggests improved safety (mean dose ± SD 1.5 ± 1.0 vs 0.33 ± 0.5; p = 0.04). Furthermore, a significant and persistent reduction in the pain management component of the HCAHPS scores suggests a durability of results extending beyond the life of the study (72.1% vs 82.0%; p = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS The implementation of a standardized analgesia protocol can significantly reduce postoperative pain among neurosurgical patients while increasing safety. Given the current climate of patient-centered outcomes, this study has broad implications for the continuum of care model proposed in the Affordable Care Act. Clinical trial registration no.: NCT01693588 ( clincaltrials.gov ).

Author List

Titsworth WL, Abram J, Guin P, Herman MA, West J, Davis NW, Bushwitz J, Hurley RW, Seubert CN

Author

Robert W. Hurley MD, PhD Adjunct Professor of Anesthesiology and CTSI in the Anesthesiology department at Medical College of Wisconsin

MESH terms used to index this publication - Major topics in bold

Analgesia
Clinical Protocols
Female
Humans
Interrupted Time Series Analysis
Male
Middle Aged
Neurosurgical Procedures
Pain Management
Pain, Postoperative
Prospective Studies
Quality Improvement