Medical College of Wisconsin
CTSICores SearchResearch InformaticsREDCap

Reduced-Intensity Transplantation for Lymphomas Using Haploidentical Related Donors Versus HLA-Matched Sibling Donors: A Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research Analysis. J Clin Oncol 2016 Sep 10;34(26):3141-9

Date

06/09/2016

Pubmed ID

27269951

Pubmed Central ID

PMC5012706

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2015.66.3476

Scopus ID

2-s2.0-84989838395 (requires institutional sign-in at Scopus site)   189 Citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: Related donor haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (Haplo-HCT) using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) is increasingly used in patients lacking HLA-matched sibling donors (MSD). We compared outcomes after Haplo-HCT using PT-Cy with MSD-HCT in patients with lymphoma, using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research registry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 987 adult patients undergoing either Haplo-HCT (n = 180) or MSD-HCT (n = 807) following reduced-intensity conditioning regimens. The haploidentical group received graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with PT-Cy with or without a calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate. The MSD group received calcineurin inhibitor-based GVHD prophylaxis.

RESULTS: Median follow-up of survivors was 3 years. The 28-day neutrophil recovery was similar in the two groups (95% v 97%; P = .31). The 28-day platelet recovery was delayed in the haploidentical group compared with the MSD group (63% v 91%; P = .001). Cumulative incidence of grade II to IV acute GVHD at day 100 was similar between the two groups (27% v 25%; P = .84). Cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD at 1 year was significantly lower after Haplo-HCT (12% v 45%; P < .001), and this benefit was confirmed on multivariate analysis (relative risk, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.31; P < .001). For Haplo-HCT v MSD-HCT, 3-year rates of nonrelapse mortality (15% v 13%; P = .41), relapse/progression (37% v 40%; P = .51), progression-free survival (48% v 48%; P = .96), and overall survival (61% v 62%; P = .82) were similar. Multivariate analysis showed no significant difference between Haplo-HCT and MSD-HCT in terms of nonrelapse mortality (P = .06), progression/relapse (P = .10), progression-free survival (P = .83), and overall survival (P = .34).

CONCLUSION: Haplo-HCT with PT-Cy provides survival outcomes comparable to MSD-HCT, with a significantly lower risk of chronic GVHD.

Author List

Ghosh N, Karmali R, Rocha V, Ahn KW, DiGilio A, Hari PN, Bachanova V, Bacher U, Dahi P, de Lima M, D'Souza A, Fenske TS, Ganguly S, Kharfan-Dabaja MA, Prestidge TD, Savani BN, Smith SM, Sureda AM, Waller EK, Jaglowski S, Herrera AF, Armand P, Salit RB, Wagner-Johnston ND, Fuchs E, BolaƱos-Meade J, Hamadani M

Authors

Kwang Woo Ahn PhD Professor in the Institute for Health and Equity department at Medical College of Wisconsin
Anita D'Souza MD Associate Professor in the Medicine department at Medical College of Wisconsin
Timothy Fenske MD Professor in the Medicine department at Medical College of Wisconsin
Mehdi H. Hamadani MD Professor in the Medicine department at Medical College of Wisconsin
Parameswaran Hari MD Adjunct Professor in the Medicine department at Medical College of Wisconsin
Samantha M. Jaglowski MD, MPH Professor in the Medicine department at Medical College of Wisconsin




MESH terms used to index this publication - Major topics in bold

Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Calcineurin Inhibitors
Cyclophosphamide
Disease-Free Survival
Drug Therapy, Combination
Female
Graft Rejection
Graft Survival
Graft vs Host Disease
HLA Antigens
Haploidy
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Histocompatibility
Histocompatibility Testing
Humans
Immunosuppressive Agents
Lymphoma
Male
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Proportional Hazards Models
Recurrence
Registries
Risk Factors
Siblings
Time Factors
Tissue Donors
Transplantation Conditioning
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult