Medical College of Wisconsin
CTSICores SearchResearch InformaticsREDCap

Spatial discrimination of glioblastoma and treatment effect with histologically-validated perfusion and diffusion magnetic resonance imaging metrics. J Neurooncol 2018 Jan;136(1):13-21

Date

09/14/2017

Pubmed ID

28900832

Pubmed Central ID

PMC5756123

DOI

10.1007/s11060-017-2617-3

Scopus ID

2-s2.0-85029185195 (requires institutional sign-in at Scopus site)   34 Citations

Abstract

The goal of this study is to spatially discriminate tumor from treatment effect (TE), within the contrast-enhancing lesion, for brain tumor patients at all stages of treatment. To this end, the diagnostic accuracy of MRI-derived diffusion and perfusion parameters to distinguish pure TE from pure glioblastoma (GBM) was determined utilizing spatially-correlated biopsy samples. From July 2010 through June 2015, brain tumor patients who underwent pre-operative DWI and DSC-MRI and stereotactic image-guided biopsy were considered for inclusion in this IRB-approved study. MRI-derived parameter maps included apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), normalized cerebral blood flow (nCBF), normalized and standardized relative cerebral blood volume (nRCBV, sRCBV), peak signal-height (PSR) and percent signal-recovery (PSR). These were co-registered to the Stealth MRI and median values extracted from the spatially-matched biopsy regions. A ROC analysis accounting for multiple subject samples was performed, and the optimal threshold for distinguishing TE from GBM determined for each parameter. Histopathologic diagnosis of pure TE (n = 10) or pure GBM (n = 34) was confirmed in tissue samples from 15 consecutive subjects with analyzable data. Perfusion thresholds of sRCBV (3575; SN/SP% = 79.4/90.0), nRCBV (1.13; SN/SP% = 82.1/90.0), and nCBF (1.05; SN/SP% = 79.4/80.0) distinguished TE from GBM (P < 0.05), whereas ADC, PSR, and PH could not (P > 0.05). The thresholds for CBF and CBV can be applied to lesions with any admixture of tumor or treatment effect, enabling the identification of true tumor burden within enhancing lesions. This approach overcomes current limitations of averaging values from both tumor and TE for quantitative assessments.

Author List

Prah MA, Al-Gizawiy MM, Mueller WM, Cochran EJ, Hoffmann RG, Connelly JM, Schmainda KM

Authors

Mona Al-Gizawiy PhD Assistant Professor in the Biophysics department at Medical College of Wisconsin
Elizabeth J. Cochran MD Adjunct Professor in the Pathology department at Medical College of Wisconsin
Jennifer M. Connelly MD Professor in the Neurology department at Medical College of Wisconsin
Wade M. Mueller MD Professor in the Neurosurgery department at Medical College of Wisconsin
Kathleen M. Schmainda PhD Professor in the Biophysics department at Medical College of Wisconsin




MESH terms used to index this publication - Major topics in bold

Adult
Aged
Brain Neoplasms
Contrast Media
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Female
Glioblastoma
Humans
Image Enhancement
Male
Middle Aged
Radiation Injuries
Sensitivity and Specificity