Accuracy of ultrasound-guided and palpation-guided knee injections by an experienced and less-experienced injector using a superolateral approach: a cadaveric study. PM R 2011 Jun;3(6):507-15
Date
06/15/2011Pubmed ID
21665162DOI
10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.02.020Scopus ID
2-s2.0-79958737563 (requires institutional sign-in at Scopus site) 59 CitationsAbstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy of ultrasound (US)-guided and palpation-guided knee injections by an experienced and a less-experienced clinician with use of a superolateral approach.
DESIGN: Single-blinded, prospective study.
SETTING: Academic institution procedural skills laboratory.
PARTICIPANTS: Twenty cadaveric knee specimens without trauma, surgery, or major deformity.
INTERVENTION: US-guided and palpation-guided knee injections of colored liquid latex were performed in each specimen by an experienced and a less-experienced clinician with use of a superolateral approach. The order of injections was randomized. The specimens were subsequently dissected by a blinded investigator and assessed for accuracy.
MAIN OUTCOMES: Accuracy was divided into 3 categories: (1) accurate (all of the injectate was within the joint), (2) partially accurate (some of the injectate was within the joint and some was within the periarticular tissues), and (3) inaccurate (none of the injectate was within the joint). The accuracy rates were calculated for each clinician and guidance method.
RESULTS: US-guided knee injections that used a superolateral approach were 100% accurate for both clinicians. Palpation-guided knee injections that used a superolateral approach were significantly influenced by experience, with the less-experienced investigator demonstrating an accuracy rate of 55% (95% confidence interval = 34%-74%) and the more experienced investigator demonstrating an accuracy rate of 100% (95% confidence interval = 81%-100%).
CONCLUSIONS: US-guided knee injections that use a superolateral approach are very accurate in a cadaveric model, whereas the accuracy of palpation-guided knee injections that use the same approach is variable and appears to be significantly influenced by clinician experience. These findings suggest that US guidance should be considered when one performs knee injections with a superolateral approach that require a high degree of accuracy.
Author List
Curtiss HM, Finnoff JT, Peck E, Hollman J, Muir J, Smith JAuthor
Heather M. Curtiss MD, MS Assistant Professor in the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation department at Medical College of WisconsinMESH terms used to index this publication - Major topics in bold
AgedCadaver
Clinical Competence
Confidence Intervals
Female
Humans
Injections, Intra-Articular
Knee Joint
Male
Palpation
Prospective Studies
Single-Blind Method
Ultrasonography, Interventional