Medical College of Wisconsin
CTSICores SearchResearch InformaticsREDCap

Prevalence and outcome of patients with cancer and acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a BleeMACS substudy. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2018 Oct;7(7):631-638

Date

06/09/2017

Pubmed ID

28593789

DOI

10.1177/2048872617706501

Scopus ID

2-s2.0-85046423390 (requires institutional sign-in at Scopus site)   86 Citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prevalence and outcome of patients with cancer that experience acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have to be determined.

METHODS AND RESULTS: The BleeMACS project is a multicentre observational registry enrolling patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention worldwide in 15 hospitals. The primary endpoint was a composite event of death and re-infarction after one year of follow-up. Bleedings were the secondary endpoint. 15,401 patients were enrolled, 926 (6.4%) in the cancer group and 14,475 (93.6%) in the group of patients without cancer. Patients with cancer were older (70.8±10.3 vs. 62.8±12.1 years, P<0.001) with more severe comorbidities and presented more frequently with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction compared with patients without cancer. After one year, patients with cancer more often experienced the composite endpoint (15.2% vs. 5.3%, P<0.001) and bleedings (6.5% vs. 3%, P<0.001). At multiple regression analysis the presence of cancer was the strongest independent predictor for the primary endpoint (hazard ratio (HR) 2.1, 1.8-2.5, P<0.001) and bleedings (HR 1.5, 1.1-2.1, P=0.015). Despite patients with cancer generally being undertreated, beta-blockers (relative risk (RR) 0.6, 0.4-0.9, P=0.05), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (RR 0.5, 0.3-0.8, P=0.02), statins (RR 0.3, 0.2-0.5, P<0.001) and dual antiplatelet therapy (RR 0.5, 0.3-0.9, P=0.05) were shown to be protective factors, while proton pump inhibitors (RR 1, 0.6-1.5, P=0.9) were neutral.

CONCLUSION: Cancer has a non-negligible prevalence in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, with a major risk of cardiovascular events and bleedings. Moreover, these patients are often undertreated from clinical despite medical therapy seems to be protective. Registration:The BleeMACS project (NCT02466854).

Author List

Iannaccone M, D'Ascenzo F, Vadalà P, Wilton SB, Noussan P, Colombo F, Raposeiras Roubín S, Abu Assi E, González-Juanatey JR, Simao Henriques JP, Saucedo J, Kikkert WJ, Nuñez-Gil I, Ariza-Sole A, Song XT, Alexopoulos D, Liebetrau C, Kawaji T, Moretti C, Garbo R, Huczek Z, Nie SP, Fujii T, Correia LC, Kawashiri MA, García Acuña JM, Southern D, Alfonso E, Terol B, Garay A, Zhang D, Chen Y, Xanthopoulou I, Osman N, Möllmann H, Shiomi H, Giordana F, Kowara M, Filipiak K, Wang X, Yan Y, Fan JY, Ikari Y, Nakahashi T, Sakata K, Gaita F, Yamagishi M, Kalpak O, Kedev S

Author

Jorge Saucedo MD Chief, Professor in the Medicine department at Medical College of Wisconsin




MESH terms used to index this publication - Major topics in bold

Acute Coronary Syndrome
Aged
Asia
Europe
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasms
North America
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Postoperative Complications
Prevalence
Registries
Risk Assessment
South America
Survival Rate
Treatment Outcome