Comparison of Conventional Gadoxetate Disodium-Enhanced MRI Features and Radiomics Signatures With Machine Learning for Diagnosing Microvascular Invasion. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021 Jun;216(6):1510-1520
Date
04/08/2021Pubmed ID
33826360DOI
10.2214/AJR.20.23255Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85106590563 (requires institutional sign-in at Scopus site) 28 CitationsAbstract
OBJECTIVE. This study aimed to determine the best model for predicting microvascular invasion (MVI) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using conventional gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (gadoxetate disodium)-enhanced MRI features and radiomics signatures with machine learning. MATERIALS AND METHODS. This retrospective study included 269 patients with a postoperative pathologic diagnosis of HCC. Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI features were assessed, including T1 relaxation time, tumor margin, tumor size, peritumoral enhancement, peritumoral hypointensity, and ADC. Radiomics models were constructed and validated by machine learning. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was used for feature selection, and radiomics-based LASSO models were constructed with six classifiers. Predictive capability was assessed using the ROC AUC. RESULTS. Histologic examination confirmed MVI in 111 (41.3%) of the 269 patients. ADC value, nonsmooth tumor margin, and 20-minute T1 relaxation time showed diagnostic accuracy with AUC values of 0.850, 0.847, and 0.846, respectively (p < .05 for all). A total of 1395 quantitative imaging features were extracted. In the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) model, the support vector machine (SVM), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and logistic regression (LR) classifiers showed greater diagnostic efficiency for predicting MVI, with AUCs of 0.942, 0.938, and 0.936, respectively (p < .05 for all). CONCLUSION. ADC value, nonsmooth tumor margin, and 20-minute T1 relaxation time show high diagnostic accuracy for predicting MVI. Radiomics signatures with machine learning can further improve the ability to predict MVI and are best modeled during HBP. The SVM, XGBoost, and LR classifiers may serve as potential biomarkers to evaluate MVI.
Author List
Chen Y, Xia Y, Tolat PP, Long L, Jiang Z, Huang Z, Tang QAuthor
Parag P. Tolat MD Chief, Associate Professor in the Radiology department at Medical College of WisconsinMESH terms used to index this publication - Major topics in bold
AdultAged
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
Cohort Studies
Contrast Media
Cross-Sectional Studies
Gadolinium DTPA
Humans
Image Enhancement
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
Liver
Liver Neoplasms
Machine Learning
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Microvessels
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Invasiveness
Retrospective Studies
Young Adult