Medical College of Wisconsin
CTSICores SearchResearch InformaticsREDCap

Patient selection and preoperative evaluation of percutaneous dilation tracheostomy in the intensive care unit. J Thorac Dis 2021 Aug;13(8):5251-5260

Date

09/17/2021

Pubmed ID

34527364

Pubmed Central ID

PMC8411154

DOI

10.21037/jtd-2019-ipicu-18

Scopus ID

2-s2.0-85113536430 (requires institutional sign-in at Scopus site)   6 Citations

Abstract

Percutaneous dilation tracheostomy (PDT) is increasingly performed at the bedside of critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). PDT is safe overall and has a number of benefits compared to surgical tracheostomy. A tracheostomy tube has numerous advantages compared to an endotracheal tube, including decreased work of breathing, ease of connecting to a mechanical ventilator, improved patient comfort and pulmonary hygiene. Common patient populations include those unable to wean from mechanical ventilation, those requiring enhanced pulmonary hygiene, and those with progressive neuromuscular weakness. Clinicians performing this procedure should be familiar with common indications for performing tracheostomy as well as absolute and relative contraindications. Special patient populations, including those with morbid obesity, aberrant anatomic and vascular anatomy, cervical spine injury, and high ventilatory requirements, should be approached with careful planning. Pre-procedure evaluation for coagulopathy, including basic laboratory analysis and medication review, should be undertaken. Pre-procedure ultrasound may be used to more accurately identify landmarks and vascular structures. The optimal timing for performing PDT is unknown and depends on the unique characteristics of each patient, perceived natural history of the disease process being addressed and open conversations with the patient or surrogate decision maker. In this review, we identify patient populations most likely to benefit from PDT and outline data behind optimal timing, pre-procedural laboratory evaluation and patient specific factors that may influence procedural success.

Author List

Barash M, Kurman JS

Authors

Mark Barash DO Assistant Professor in the Medicine department at Medical College of Wisconsin
Jonathan S. Kurman MD Assistant Professor in the Medicine department at Medical College of Wisconsin