Medical College of Wisconsin
CTSICores SearchResearch InformaticsREDCap

The Arm Movement Detection (AMD) test: a fast robotic test of proprioceptive acuity in the arm. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2017 Jun 28;14(1):64

Date

07/01/2017

Pubmed ID

28659156

Pubmed Central ID

PMC5490232

DOI

10.1186/s12984-017-0269-3

Scopus ID

2-s2.0-85021390387 (requires institutional sign-in at Scopus site)   9 Citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We examined the validity and reliability of a short robotic test of upper limb proprioception, the Arm Movement Detection (AMD) test, which yields a ratio-scaled, objective outcome measure to be used for evaluating the impact of sensory deficits on impairments of motor control, motor adaptation and functional recovery in stroke survivors.

METHODS: Subjects grasped the handle of a horizontal planar robot, with their arm and the robot hidden from view. The robot applied graded force perturbations, which produced small displacements of the handle. The AMD test required subjects to respond verbally to queries regarding whether or not they detected arm motions. Each participant completed ten, 60s trials; in five of the trials, force perturbations were increased in small increments until the participant detected motion while in the others, perturbations were decreased until the participant could no longer detect motion. The mean and standard deviation of the 10 movement detection thresholds were used to compute a Proprioceptive Acuity Score (PAS). Based on the sensitivity and consistency of the estimated thresholds, the PAS quantifies the likelihood that proprioception is intact. Lower PAS scores correspond to higher proprioceptive acuity. Thirty-nine participants completed the AMD test, consisting of 25 neurologically intact control participants (NIC), seven survivors of stroke with intact proprioception in the more affected limb (HSS+P), and seven survivors of stroke with impaired or absent proprioception in the more affected limb (HSS-P).

RESULTS: Significant group differences were found, with the NIC and HSS+P groups having lower (i.e., better) PAS scores than the HSS-P group. A subset of the participants completed the AMD test multiple times and the AMD test was found to be reliable across repetitions.

CONCLUSIONS: The AMD test required less than 15 min to complete and provided an objective, ratio-scaled measure of proprioceptive acuity in the upper limb. In the future, this test could be utilized to evaluate the contributions of sensory deficits to motor recovery following stroke.

Author List

Mrotek LA, Bengtson M, Stoeckmann T, Botzer L, Ghez CP, McGuire J, Scheidt RA

Authors

Robert Scheidt BS,MS,PhD Associate Professor in the Biomedical Engineering department at Marquette University
Tina Stoeckmann PT, DSc, MA Associate Clinical Professor & Neurologic PT Residency Program Coordinator in the Physical Therapy department at Marquette University




MESH terms used to index this publication - Major topics in bold

Adult
Aged
Algorithms
Arm
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Movement
Proprioception
Psychomotor Performance
Recovery of Function
Reproducibility of Results
Robotics
Stroke Rehabilitation
Survivors